The properties of three different kinds of atomic-layer-deposited (ALD) W thin films were comparatively characterized and investigated as nucleation layers for the W-plug process of design-rule dynamic random access memory. ALD-W (A) film was deposited using alternating exposures of and and ALD-W (B) film was treated with for prior to W ALD using and . Finally, ALD-W (C) film was deposited using alternating exposures of and . All the ALD-W films showed excellent step coverage at the contact with an aspect ratio of , but their resistivities were as high as at the thickness of . High resistivities of ALD-W films are discussed on the basis of impurities cooperation such as Si and B, phase (body-centered-cubic α-W or primitive cubic β-W), crystallinity (crystalline or amorphous), and grain size. It was found that ALD-W (C) film formed an amorphous phase, which was stable until annealing. This is clearly different from ALD-W (A) and ALD-W (B) with polycrystalline grains of α-W and β-W, and β-W was transformed to α-W after annealing. The formation of amorphous W resulted in the formation of large-size grains of chemical-vapor-deposited W film deposited on ALD-W (C) and the reduction in the resistivity of W-plug stack. The integration results showed that the reduced resistivity of W-plug stack with ALD-W (C) provided a significantly lower resistance at the W bit line contact. Another advantage of the integration scheme with ALD-W (C) was its stable contact resistance at the ultrahigh aspect ratio (UHAR) contact even though the step coverage of the underlayer, , was poor. It was also found that the pretreatment was effective for obtaining the low and stable contact resistance at UHAR contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: