Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simplified staged thermal runaway (TR) models are attractive for early-stage battery safety assessment, but they are usually parameterized for a single cell type and rely on internal temperature measurements that are impractical in sealed cylindrical and pouch cells. This work extends a four-stage TR modeling framework so it can be applied to cylindrical and pouch cells of different sizes with nickel-rich layered-oxide cathodes using surface-temperature data from accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) alone. Four modifications are introduced: an objective segmentation of the temperature-rate curve by three-segment piecewise regression with free breakpoints; a regularized extraction of the Arrhenius parameters that removes the ill-conditioned data at each stage end; a stage-dependent mass-loss function, including a two-step venting formulation for cells with delayed vent opening; and format-specific non-adiabatic boundary conditions for the severe and cooling phases. Adiabatic TR experiments were performed on three samples each of a 4.5 Ah 21700 NMC cylindrical cell, a 33 Ah 4695 NCMA cylindrical cell, and a 65 Ah NMC pouch cell. The model reproduces the measured temperature and temperature-rise rate for all three formats. The results quantify how strongly cell format governs TR severity and indicate that TR in large-format pouch cells can be accurately described without internal instrumentation. Applicability to prismatic cells and to other cathode chemistries, such as LFP, has not been demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vujnović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: