Comparative study reveals differential thermal runaway characteristics in lithium-ion batteries, indicating safety implications.
To address the research gap in adiabatic thermal runaway (TR) characteristics of large - capacity (>100 Ah) lithium - ion batteries—LiFePO4 (LFP) and LiNi0.9Co0.05Mn0.05O2 (NCM90.50.5) cells—this study systematically investigated the TR processes of 129 Ah NCM and 107 Ah LFP cells via an accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) under a unified experimental environment, aiming to reveal their differential TR mechanisms.ARC tests divided cell TR into four stages, and an Arrhenius - based heat generation model was established. Results showed that for the NCM cell: self - heating onset temperature (T1) = 102.3 °C, TR trigger temperature (T2) = 156.5 °C (coinciding with valve - opening temperature, Tvent/ = T2), voltage - fluctuation - to - TR warning time = 256 s, and maximum TR temperature (T3) = 1000 °C. In contrast, LFP cell: T1 = 90.7 °C, T2 = 189.7 °C, warning time = 8600 s, T3 = 491 °C. Moreover, the LFP cell's double - jellyroll structure induced a secondary thermal reaction at TR's final stage. Kinetic fitting indicated the NCM heat generation model: y = 7.2×10−22·(T(t)/T)9.77. Its temperature sensitivity (b = 9.77) was significantly higher than LFP's (b = 3.195), demonstrating more intense TR reactions and faster reaction acceleration in NCM cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: