Key result
Enhanced external counter pulsation improved angina symptoms by at least one Canadian Cardiovascular Society class in 79% of patients with refractory angina pectoris.
Why the study?
Does enhanced external counter pulsation improve angina symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris?
Observational (n=86)
No
Does enhanced external counter pulsation improve angina symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris?
EECP is an effective treatment for improving symptoms in patients with severe refractory angina (CCS III-IV), though benefits may not be sustained in those with milder (CCS II) symptoms.
Should not yet change practice in refractory angina; leaves open randomized confirmation of EECP benefit.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris ineligible to further traditional treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EECP on patients at a Scandinavian medical centre and to investigate if outcome can be predicted by analysing baseline factors. METHODS: 86 consecutive patients (70 male, 16 female) were treated with EECP and followed for two years post treatment. Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class was analysed, and medication and adverse clinical events were researched prior to EECP, at the end of the treatment, and at six, 12 and 24 months thereafter. Patients responding to therapy by improving at least one CCS class were compared with those who failed to respond. Any differences in background factors were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: 79% of the patients responded to therapy by improving at least one CCS class. In general, the CCS class improved by one class after EECP treatment (3.05 before versus 2.14 after treatment). A total of 61.5% of the initial responders showed sustained improvement at the 12 month follow-up while 29% presented sustained improvement after 24 months. Treatment was most effective among patients suffering from CCS class III-IV angina pectoris, while patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris improved transiently but failed to show sustained improvement after the 12 month follow-up. Diabetes mellitus and calcium channel antagonists were more common among the non-responders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and efficiency of EECP as a treatment option for patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. The therapy is most beneficial in patients suffering from severe angina (CCS III-IV) while sustained response to therapy could not be verified among patients suffering from CCS class II angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erdling et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Refractory angina pectoris (n=86). Enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) was evaluated on Improvement of at least one Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class. Enhanced external counter pulsation improved angina symptoms by at least one Canadian Cardiovascular Society class in 79% of patients with refractory angina pectoris.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: