Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nathalie Fournier, « Qui, que, quoi in 17th-century French grammars: Maupas (1618), Oudin (1640), Chiflet (1659), Régnier-Desmarais (1705) ». This paper deals with the pronouns qui, que, quoi in the French grammatical tradition, through four grammars of the 17th century: Maupas (1618), Oudin (1640), Chiflet (1659), Régnier-Desmarais (1705). The paper examines successively: 1. the mono- or bi-categorization of qui, que, quoi as relative pronouns, or as relative and interrogative pronouns; 2. the morphology of qui, que, quoi, and the problem of que, as a non-relative pronoun; 3. the uses of qui, que, quoi, syntactically (with or without any antecedent, functional specificity), and semantically (reference to human/non-human, definite/non-definite). The paper aims to show the relevance of grammatical description and how it contributed to the constitution of the French grammatical tradition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathalie Fournier (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: