Metabolic bone disease is common in children and adults with chronic cholestasis. We evaluated baseline vitamin D (vitamin D2 and D3), 25-OH vitamin D2 and D3, 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D, vitamin D-binding protein, bone mineral content and dietary mineral content in six children (mean age: 12.1 years) with cholestasis since infancy. Absorption of 25-OH vitamin D3 and vitamin D2 was evaluated by measuring serial serum concentrations after a test dose. Bone mineral content was reduced by >2 S.D. in five of six subjects compared to age-specific controls; none had radiographic evidence of rickets but all had osteopenia. Dietary Ca and P content in the subjects was comparable to the recommended daily allowance for age-specific children. Baseline serum vitamin D2 concentrations were undetectable in all but one cholestatic subject despite oral supplementation with 2,500 to 50,000 IU per day vitamin D2. Baseline serum 25-OH vitamin D was 33.2 ± 6.0 ng per ml (mean ± S.E.) and comparable to our laboratory norms (15 to 50 ng per ml). Serum 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D and “free” 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D were both significantly (p<0.05) reduced compared to controls. A significantly blunted rise and reduced area under the absorption curve (both p<0.001) after 1,000 IU per kg vitamin D2 was found in cholestatic children (0.8 ng ± 0.5 ng per ml and 18.0 ± 14.3 ng hr per ml, respectively) compared to controls (59.5 ± 10.0 ng per ml and 1,780 ± 253 ng hr per ml, respectively). The peak change and area under the absorption curve for 25-OH vitamin D3 from baseline after 10 μg per kg 25-OH vitamin D3 was significantly reduced (both p<0.05) in cholestatic children (60.2 ± 13.8 ng per ml and 751.5 ± 189.9 ng hr per ml, respectively) compared to controls (151.6 ± 30.7 ng per ml and 2,021 ± 472 ng hr per ml, respectively). We conclude that despite severe vitamin D malabsorption, normal serum 25-OH vitamin D concentrations in cholestatic children most likely result from sunlight-stimulated endogenous vitamin D synthesis. Use of oral 25-OH vitamin D should be considered in cholestatic children because its absorption is less impaired than vitamin D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heubi et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: