Randomized trial evaluates a new microassay for measuring 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in clinical samples, indicating its potential in limited-sample scenarios.
This report describes a microassay for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D] in plasma which does not require high performance liquid chromatography. The assay involves rapid extraction and preliminary purification on a C-18 Sep-Pak cartridge, followed by final purification on a silica Sep-Pak using hexane-isopropanol. Quantitation of 1,25-(OH)2D is achieved using a nonequilibrium assay employing 1,25-(OH)2D receptor from calf thymus. The method is sensitive to 1.5 pg/tube, with B50 occurring at 9 pg/tube and a useful assay range of 1.5-40 pg/tube. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are 6.5% and 11.5%, respectively, and the method is linear over a wide range of sample dilutions. In addition, this assay measures both 1,25-(OH)2D2 and 1,25-(OH)2D3 with equal affinity. The importance of using an assay with equal affinity for 1,25-(OH)2D2 and 1,25-(OH)2D3 is demonstrated by the findings that 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (250HD2) constituted 38.9% of the total 25-OHD found in clinical samples (12.6 +/- 0.7 ng/ml 25-OHD2 vs. 20.1 +/- 0.5 ng/ml 25-OHD3; n = 807). Results of this new assay have been compared to those of the assay of Horst et al. (21), which employs Sephadex LH-20 and high performance liquid chromatography sample purification. The correlation coefficient was r2 = 0.96, and the slope was 1.05. Using this new assay, plasma 1,25-(OH)2D concentrations were as follows: normal adults, 37.4 +/- 2.2 pg/ml (n = 22); chronic renal failure, 10.6 +/- 1.5 pg/ml (n = 7); anephrics, undetectable (n = 10); infant cord blood, 22.9 +/- 4.4 pg/ml (n = 7); and hyperparathyroidism, 68.9 +/- 5.0 pg/ml (n = 13). This assay should be particularly useful in pediatric or other studies in which sample size is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinhardt et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: