The different opinions concerning the value of fine-needle biopsy may partly be explained by divergencies in results between examiners. 103 coded fine-needle aspiration biopsy smears were stained by the May-Grünwald-Giemsa's method and examined independently by two investigators by light microscopy. Complete agreement in classification or slight disagreement occurred in 94–98% of the smears for recognition of the degree of vacuolization, granulation, bile accumulation, and nuclear size variation. Similar results were obtained in 83 and 90% for bile epithelium and connective tissue, respectively. Correlation between the clinical diagnoses and the cytological alterations did not show any characteristic ‘profile'. In 5 cases with acute alcoholic hepatitis and in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis high grades of bile duct epithelium were present. A correct diagnosis of liver cancer was made by both examiners in the same percentage of cases in the smears as in the conventional liver biopsies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansen et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: