Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The past three decades have witnessed notable advances in establishing photosensitizer-antibody photo-immunoconjugates for photo-immunotherapy and imaging of tumors. Photo-immunotherapy minimizes damage to surrounding healthy tissue when using a cancer-selective photo-immunoconjugate, but requires a threshold intracellular photosensitizer concentration to be effective. Delivery of immunoconjugates to the target cells is often hindered by I) the low photosensitizer-to-antibody ratio of photo-immunoconjugates and II) the limited amount of target molecule presented on the cell surface. Here, a nanoengineering approach is introduced to overcome these obstacles and improve the effectiveness of photo-immunotherapy and imaging. Click chemistry coupling of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD)-Cetuximab photo-immunoconjugates onto FKR560 dye-containing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles markedly enhances intracellular photo-immunoconjugate accumulation and potentiates light-activated photo-immunotoxicity in ovarian cancer and glioblastoma. It is further demonstrated that co-delivery and light activation of BPD and FKR560 allow longitudinal fluorescence tracking of photoimmunoconjugate and nanoparticle in cells. Using xenograft mouse models of epithelial ovarian cancer, intravenous injection of photo-immunoconjugated nanoparticles doubles intratumoral accumulation of photo-immunoconjugates, resulting in an enhanced photoimmunotherapy-mediated tumor volume reduction, compared to "standard" immunoconjugates. This generalizable "carrier effect" phenomenon is attributed to the successful incorporation of photo-immunoconjugates onto a nanoplatform, which modulates immunoconjugate delivery and improves treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: