Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The concept of immune regulation/suppression has been well-established and, besides thymus-derived CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (TR) cells, it became clear that a variety of additional peripherally induced TR cells play vital roles in protection from many harmful immune responses including intestinal inflammation. In the present study, we have analyzed in vivo-induced Ag-specific CD4+ TR cells with respect to their molecular and functional phenotype. By comparative genomics we could show that these Ag-specific TR cells induced by chronic Ag stimulation in vivo clearly differ in their genetic program from naturally occurring thymus-derived CD4+CD25+ TR cells. This distinct population of induced TR cells express neither CD25 nor the TR-associated transcription factor Foxp3. Strikingly, CD25 is not even up-regulated upon stimulation. Despite the lack in Foxp3 expression, these in vivo-induced CD25- TR cells are able to interfere with an Ag-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation without significant increase in CD25 and Foxp3 expression. Thus, our results demonstrate that in vivo-induced Ag-specific TR cells represent a distinct population of Foxp3-CD25- TR cells with regulatory capacity both in vitro and in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: