Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & delivery weight with documented pre-pregnancy & delivery weight and determine whether there are differences compared with the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 234 women. Inclusion criteria included documented height, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight, self-reported delivery weight, documented pre-pregnancy weight ± 12 weeks from last menstrual period, and documented delivery weight ± 2 weeks from delivery. We determined the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight vs. documented pre-pregnancy weight and self-reported delivery weight vs. documented delivery weight. Using documented pre-pregnancy weight and documented delivery weight, we calculated gestational weight gain (GWG) relative to IOM criteria. RESULTS: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight was 2.94 kg less than documented pre-pregnancy weight (p < 0.0001). Self-reported BMI was 1.11 mg/kg(2) less than documented BMI (p < 0.0001). Self-reported GWG was 3.01 kg greater than documented GWG (p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of normal weight correctly classified pregravid BMI in contrast to 86% of obese (p < 0.005) and 73% of overweight (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese women underestimated self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & overestimated GWG, thereby mistakenly categorizing IOM guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandujano et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: