Key result
Regional citrate anticoagulation during 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis safely maintained target circuit and patient ionized calcium levels without metabolic complications using only pre- and post-treatment laboratory surveillance.
Why the study?
Does regional citrate anticoagulation safely maintain target ionized calcium levels without metabolic complications in patients undergoing 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does regional citrate anticoagulation safely maintain target ionized calcium levels without metabolic complications in patients undergoing 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis?
Regional citrate anticoagulation is safe and effective for 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis, requiring increased calcium infusion compared to continuous renal replacement therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support reduced laboratory monitoring with regional citrate anticoagulation in 8-hour SLED; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients who may benefit from sustained low-efficiency dialysis therapy are often at risk for bleeding. A safe and simple "regional" anticoagulation strategy would be beneficial. The modification of existing regional citrate anticoagulation protocols to typically performed 8-h sustained low-efficiency dialysis is necessary. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Sustained low-efficiency dialysis was performed at blood and dialysate rates of 250 and 300 ml/min, respectively. The circuit was anticoagulated with 4% sodium citrate (citrate 136, sodium 408 mmol/L) and reversed with CaCl(2). Every 2 h, electrolytes, ionized circuit, and patient calcium were monitored during the first two versions. The second version differed by an increased infusion of CaCl(2) and lower infusion of citrate, both by 10%. The third version measured only laboratory values before and after sustained low-efficiency dialysis. RESULTS: There were 41 treatments in the first iteration, 42 in the second, and 34 in the final iteration. All versions were titrated to maintain patient ionized calcium of 4.0 to 4.8 mg/dl (1.0 to 1.2 mmol/L) and the circuit ionized calcium between 0.8 and 1.6 mg/dl (0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L). The final protocol infusion was 31 mmol/h citrate and 41 mmol/h elemental calcium, which kept circuit and patient ionized calcium at targets. No unexpected metabolic complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with continuous renal replacement therapy, one must increase the calcium infusion because of the more efficient removal of the calcium citrate complex. Safe and effective regional citrate anticoagulation can be performed in 8-h sustained low-efficiency dialysis without metabolic complications with laboratory surveillance only before and after sustained low-efficiency dialysis treatment; however, certain safeguards are mandatory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Acute or chronic renal failure requiring sustained low-efficiency dialysis with high bleeding risk (n=30). Regional citrate anticoagulation was evaluated on Maintenance of target circuit and patient ionized calcium without metabolic complications. Regional citrate anticoagulation during 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis safely maintained target circuit and patient ionized calcium levels without metabolic complications using only pre- and post-treatment laboratory surveillance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: