Key result
Adavosertib does not have a clinically important effect on QTc prolongation in patients with advanced solid tumors, with the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval for ΔQTcF remaining below 10 ms.
Why the study?
Molecularly targeted oncology agents can increase cardiovascular risk, including QT prolongation and arrhythmias, prompting evaluation of the effect of adavosertib on the QTc interval.
Does adavosertib prolong the QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors?
Does adavosertib prolong the QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors?
Mean Difference: -0.8 (95% CI -5.1–3.6)
p-value: p=0.27
Adavosertib does not cause clinically significant QTc prolongation at clinically relevant exposures in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Adavosertib shows no clinically relevant QTc effect; supports further oncology development but leaves confirmation to larger randomized trials.
Purpose Adavosertib is a small-molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of Wee1 kinase. Molecularly targeted oncology agents have the potential to increase the risk of cardiovascular events, including prolongation of QT interval and associated cardiac arrhythmias. This study investigated the effect of adavosertib on the QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age with advanced solid tumors for which no standard therapy existed. Patients received adavosertib 225 mg twice daily on days 1–2 at 12-h intervals and once on day 3. Patients underwent digital 12-lead electrocardiogram and pharmacokinetic assessments pre-administration and time-matched assessments during the drug administration period. The relationship between maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and baseline-adjusted corrected QT interval by Fridericia (QTcF) was estimated using a prespecified linear mixed-effects model. Results Twenty-one patients received adavosertib. Concentration–QT modeling of ΔQTcF and the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval corresponding to the geometric mean of Cmax observed on days 1 and 3 were below the threshold for regulatory concern (not > 10 ms). No significant relationship between ΔQTcF (vs baseline) and adavosertib concentration was identified (P = 0.27). Pharmacokinetics and the adverse event (AE) profile were consistent with previous studies at this dose. Eleven (52.4%) patients experienced 17 treatment-related AEs in total, including diarrhea and nausea (both reported in six [28.6%] patients), vomiting (reported in two [9.5%] patients), anemia, decreased appetite, and constipation (all reported in one [4.8%] patient). Conclusion Adavosertib does not have a clinically important effect on QTc prolongation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03333824.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Någård et al. (2023) studied Advanced solid tumors (n=21). Adavosertib (AZD1775) vs. Baseline (time-matched) was evaluated on Baseline-adjusted corrected QT interval by Fridericia (ΔQTcF) at geometric mean Cmax on day 3 (MD -0.8 ms, 95% CI -5.1 to 3.6, p=0.27). Adavosertib does not have a clinically important effect on QTc prolongation in patients with advanced solid tumors, with the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval for ΔQTcF remaining below 10 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: