Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The format for Expert Panel Reports includes synopses of studies reviewed, followed by an evaluation of the Strengths/Weaknesses and Utility (Adequacy) of the study for a CERHR evaluation.Statements and conclusions made under Strengths/ Weaknesses and Utility evaluations are those of the Expert Panel and are prepared according to the NTP/NIEHS guidelines.In addition, the Panel often makes comments or notes limitations in the synopses of the study.Bold, square brackets are used to enclose such statements.As discussed in the guidelines, square brackets are used to enclose key items of information not provided in a publication, limitations noted in the study, conclusions that differ from authors, and conversions or analyses of data conducted by the Panel.The findings and conclusions of this report are those of the expert panel and should not be construed to represent the views of the National Toxicology Program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luderer et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: