Key result
Borderline and hypoplastic left ventricles had a shorter superolateral support length ratio compared to normal ventricles.
Why the study?
Does papillary muscle morphology assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance differ between children with normal, borderline, and hypoplastic left ventricles?
Observational (n=65)
Does papillary muscle morphology assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance differ between children with normal, borderline, and hypoplastic left ventricles?
Papillary muscle morphology, specifically the superolateral support, differs significantly in borderline and hypoplastic left ventricles compared to normal, which has important implications for surgical options.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR papillary muscle assessment may refine surgical planning in borderline left ventricles; extends anatomic description but leaves open outcome prediction.
OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve anatomy has a significant impact on potential surgical options for patients with hypoplastic or borderline left ventricle. Papillary muscle morphology is a major component regarding this aspect. The purpose of this study was to use cardiac magnetic resonance to describe the differences in papillary muscle anatomy between normal, borderline, and hypoplastic left ventricles. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective, observational cardiac magnetic resonance study of children (median age 5.36 years) with normal (n=30), borderline (n=22), or hypoplastic (n=13) left ventricles. Borderline and hypoplastic cases had undergone an initial hybrid procedure. Morphological features of the papillary muscles, location, and arrangement were analysed and compared across groups. RESULTS: All normal ventricles had two papillary muscles with narrow pedicles; however, 18% of borderline and 46% of hypoplastic cases had a single papillary muscle, usually the inferomedial type. In addition, in borderline or hypoplastic ventricles, the supporting pedicle occasionally displayed a wide insertion along the ventricular wall. The length ratio of the superolateral support was significantly different between groups (normal: 0.46±0.08; borderline: 0.39±0.07; hypoplastic: 0.36±0.1; p=0.009). No significant difference, however, was found when analysing the inferomedial type (0.42±0.09; 0.38±0.07; 0.39±0.22, p=0.39). The angle subtended between supports was also similar among groups (113°±17°; 111°±51° and 114°±57°; p=0.99). A total of eight children with borderline left ventricle underwent biventricular repair. There were no significant differentiating features for papillary muscle morphology in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The superolateral support can be shorter or absent in borderline or hypoplastic left ventricle cases. The papillary muscle pedicles in these patients often show a broad insertion. These changes have important implications on surgical options and should be described routinely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forte et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Borderline or hypoplastic left ventricle (n=65). Borderline or hypoplastic left ventricle vs. Normal left ventricle was evaluated on Length ratio of the superolateral support (p=0.009). Borderline and hypoplastic left ventricles had a shorter superolateral support length ratio compared to normal ventricles.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: