Key result
The INTERSALT method provided the best estimation of mean sodium intake in summer (bias -39.7 mg; 95% CI -164.7 to 85.3), whereas the Kawasaki method was superior in winter.
Why the study?
Twenty-four-hour urine collection is the gold standard for sodium intake evaluation but can be difficult to implement, prompting validation of four estimation methods.
Do estimating methods (Kawasaki, INTERSALT, Tanaka, Sun's) accurately evaluate 24-h urinary sodium excretion compared to 24-h urine collection in healthy volunteers across seasons?
Cross-Sectional (n=268)
Do estimating methods (Kawasaki, INTERSALT, Tanaka, Sun's) accurately evaluate 24-h urinary sodium excretion compared to 24-h urine collection in healthy volunteers across seasons?
Mean Difference: -39.7 (95% CI -164.7–85.3)
The accuracy of methods estimating 24-h urinary sodium excretion from spot urine samples varies by season, with INTERSALT performing best in summer and Kawasaki in winter.
Seasonal differences may affect spot-urine sodium estimation accuracy; leaves open optimal method selection for year-round clinical or research use.
Twenty-four-hour urine sample collection is regarded as the gold standard for sodium intake evaluation, but the implementation can be difficult. The objective was to validate and evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of estimating sodium intake by four methods. A group of 268 healthy volunteers aged 18-25 years was enrolled in this study. Twenty-four-hour urine samples as well as timed (morning, afternoon, evening, and overnight) urine samples were randomly collected in summer and winter. The sodium intake was estimated by four published methods-Kawasaki, INTERSALT, Tanaka, and Sun's. The consistencies between estimated sodium intake and real measured values of 24-h urinary sodium excretion were compared by Bland-Altman plots in each of the methods. The 24-h urinary sodium analysis result indicated that average daily sodium intake was 3048.4 ± 1225.9 mg in summer and 3564.7 ± 1369.9 mg in winter. At the population level, the bias (estimated value-measured value) was the least with the INTERSALT method with afternoon (-39.7 mg; 95%CI: -164.7, 85.3 mg) and evening (-43.5 mg; 95%CI: -166.4, 79.5 mg) samples in summer. In winter, the Kawasaki method (162.1 mg; 95%CI: 13.5, 310.7 mg) was superior to others. Estimation of sodium intake using the four methods is affected by the time and temperature. In summer, the INTERSALT method provides the best estimation of the population's mean sodium intake. The Kawasaki method is superior to other methods in winter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=268). Estimating methods for sodium intake (Kawasaki, INTERSALT, Tanaka, Sun's) vs. Measured 24-h urinary sodium excretion was evaluated on Consistency between estimated sodium intake and measured 24-h urinary sodium excretion (MD -39.7 mg, 95% CI -164.7 to 85.3). The INTERSALT method provided the best estimation of mean sodium intake in summer (bias -39.7 mg; 95% CI -164.7 to 85.3), whereas the Kawasaki method was superior in winter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: