Key result
Osteopathic manipulative treatment was not associated with a significant difference in length of stay compared to no OMT (11.0 vs 10.4 days; P=0.90) in postthoracotomy patients.
Why the study?
Does osteopathic manipulative treatment reduce length of stay in hospitalized posterolateral postthoracotomy patients?
Cohort (n=38)
Does osteopathic manipulative treatment reduce length of stay in hospitalized posterolateral postthoracotomy patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 10.4%
p-value: p=.90
Osteopathic manipulative treatment did not significantly reduce length of stay in postthoracotomy patients, though the OMT group appeared to have greater baseline severity of illness.
No LOS difference despite greater illness severity in OMT group; leaves open efficacy in balanced postthoracotomy cohorts.
Objective This study retrospectively evaluated the effect of OMT on length of stay (LOS) in hospitalized posterolateral postthoracotomy patients. Methods Inpatient medical records of patients who received posterolateral thoracotomies with lung resection between 1998 and 2011 were reviewed for demographic data, LOS, thoracotomy surgery data, consultation data excluding osteopathic manipulative medicine, discharge data, and osteopathic manipulative medicine consultation data. Results Thirty-eight patients received posterolateral thoracotomies with lung resection; 23 patients received OMT and 15 did not. The mean (standard deviation) LOS was 11.0 (6.8) days (range, 5–29 days) for those who received OMT and 10.4 (5.5) days (range, 3–22 days) for those who did not ( P = .90). Five patients developed postoperative ileus, and all had received OMT. Patients receiving 2 surgical procedures had a longer LOS than those receiving 1 surgical procedure ( P = .002). Having a decortication performed during the thoracotomy increased LOS by a mean of 6.4 days ( P = .005). Patients admitted directly to the intensive care unit were more likely to receive OMT than those who were not ( P = .03). Conclusion While there was no difference in LOS, severity of illness was different between patients who received OMT and those who did not. Patients who developed postoperative ileus and most of those admitted directly to the intensive care unit received OMT, suggesting that severity of illness was greater for those who received OMT. Future studies should include a higher subject number in order to stratify for illness severity and also assess the effect of OMT on postoperative pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleming et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Posterolateral postthoracotomy (n=38). Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) vs. No OMT was evaluated on Length of stay (LOS) (p=.90). Osteopathic manipulative treatment was not associated with a significant difference in length of stay compared to no OMT (11.0 vs 10.4 days; P=0.90) in postthoracotomy patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: