A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with a diode array detector (DAD) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was established to obtain the maximum response for the extraction of phenolic compounds in plums (Prunus salicina Lindl). The effects of solvent relationship (methanol/water) (0 to 100%, v/v) and ultrasound extraction time (5 to 30 min) using a multivariate design and response surface methodology were studied. All of the studied extracted condition models established showed significant effects (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the determination of common optimum combination for all compounds was complex and a weighted desirability function was applied to maximize the extraction for each analyte. The optimum conditions of extraction were for a period of 30 min. For the solvent optimized conditions (84/16 methanol/water, v/v), the important phenolic compounds selected in the design model according to the concentration range and insignificant lack of fit p-value were extracted, detected, and quantified with a probability of 84% including hydroxycinnamic acids (chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acids), flavonols (quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, isoharmentin-3-O-rutinoside), and anthocyanins (cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside). The validity and adequacy of the predictive extraction model was checked in plums and no significant differences were detected between the predicted and the actual phenolic contents. The intra-day and inter-day assay repeatabilities for the analysis of real samples were less than 11.5% and 11.7%, respectively. Recovery values between 72.0 and 112% were obtained for all compounds. For all these reasons, the methodology is appropriate for the routine determination of the majority of phenolic compounds in Prunus salicina Lindl.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durán et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: