Key result
The ACE DD genotype was associated with a significantly steeper decline in GFR following renal transplantation compared with the ACE II genotype (-4.3 vs -1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2/yr; p=0.035).
Why the study?
Does the ACE DD genotype associate with a steeper decline in GFR and changes in blood pressure or LVMI in children following renal transplantation?
Cohort (n=107)
Does the ACE DD genotype associate with a steeper decline in GFR and changes in blood pressure or LVMI in children following renal transplantation?
The ACE DD genotype is a potential marker for identifying pediatric renal transplant patients at high risk of poor allograft outcome, as it is associated with a steeper decline in GFR.
Büscher R, Nagel D, Finkelberg I, Büscher AK, Wingen A‐M, Kranz B, Vester U, Hoyer PF. Donor and recipient ACE I/D genotype are associated with loss of renal function in children following renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplantation 2011: 15:214–220. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Genetic polymorphisms of the RAS correlate with allograft function. We therefore analyzed common RAS polymorphisms in kidney donors and in children following RTx to determine the relationship between genotype and decline in GFR, blood pressure, and LVM. A total of 107 children who underwent RTx were included: 70 male, 37 female, mean age 8.8 ± 4.9 yr, mean follow up 5.4 yr. The following RAS polymorphisms were studied in all 107 recipients, 48 donors, and 120 healthy controls: Renin (Renin Mbol 18G/A), ACE I/D; angiotensinogen (AGT M235T), and angiotensin II receptor type‐1 (AT1R A1166C). Only patients homozygous for the ACE D allele had a significantly steeper decline in GFR compared with homozygous carriers of the ACE I allele (slope DD: −4.3 ± 0.8 vs. II: −1.3 ± 1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 per yr; p = 0.035). In four cases, a DD recipient received a kidney from a DD donor, and these patients showed a more pronounced decline in GFR (−5.2 ± 0.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 per yr; p = 0.002). MABP was not different before vs. after RTx and was independent of ACE I/D genotype. LVMI increased significantly in the majority of patients (36.6 ± 13.9 g/m2.7 six months before RTx vs. 46.4 ± 15.3 g/m2.7 12 months after RTx, p = 0.015). However, this difference disappeared after stratification by ACE I/D genotype. The ACE DD genotype is a potential marker for identifying patients at high risk of poor allograft outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Büscher et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Renal transplantation (n=107). ACE DD genotype vs. ACE II genotype was evaluated on Decline in GFR (slope in mL/min/1.73 m2 per yr) (p=0.035). The ACE DD genotype was associated with a significantly steeper decline in GFR following renal transplantation compared with the ACE II genotype (-4.3 vs -1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2/yr; p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: