Population
Patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease
Comparison
Telemedicine/telehealth for cardiac and… vs Traditional, face-to-face cardiopulmonary…
Design
Guideline
Authors
Loading...
Clinicians may adopt telemedicine for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation under equivalent standards; extends guideline support to remote and hybrid models.
This position statement establishes that telemedicine in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation is a valid modality when held to the same clinical, ethical, and reimbursement standards as in-person care.
Shaw et al. (2001) studied Cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Telemedicine/telehealth vs. Traditional, face-to-face services was evaluated. The AACVPR supports the appropriate use of telemedicine for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, provided it adheres to the same ethical and professional standards as traditional face-to-face care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: