Key result
The combination of CLUS and LRG1 biomarkers showed improved performance for distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases compared to CA125 alone (AUC 0.837 vs 0.811).
Why the study?
Does the combination of CLUS and LRG1 improve diagnostic performance for ovarian cancer compared to CA125 alone?
Observational
Does the combination of CLUS and LRG1 improve diagnostic performance for ovarian cancer compared to CA125 alone?
The combination of serum CLUS and LRG1 may offer improved diagnostic performance over CA125 alone for distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases.
Should not yet change CA125-based ovarian cancer diagnostics; hypothesis-generating for CLUS-LRG1 panel validation.
Herein, we identify and confirm differentially expressed sialoglycoproteins in the serum of patients with ovarian cancer. On the basis of Sambucus nigra (SNA) lectin enrichment and on an isobaric chemical labeling quantitative strategy, clusterin (CLUS), leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein (LRG1), hemopexin (HEMO), vitamin D-binding protein (VDB), and complement factor H (CFH) were found to be differentially expressed in the serum of patients with ovarian cancer compared to benign diseases. The abnormal sialylation levels of CLUS, CFH, and HEMO in serum of ovarian cancer patients were verified by a lectin-based ELISA assay. ELISA assays were further applied to measure total protein level changes of these glycoproteins. Protein levels of CLUS were found to be down-regulated in the serum of ovarian cancer patients, while protein levels of LRG1 were increased. The combination of CLUS and LRG1 (AUC = 0.837) showed improved performance for distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases compared to CA125 alone (AUC = 0.811). In differentiating early stage ovarian cancer from benign diseases or healthy controls, LRG1 showed comparable performance to CA125. An independent sample set was further used to confirm the ability of these candidate markers to detect patients with ovarian cancer. Our study provides a comprehensive strategy for the identification of candidate biomarkers that show the potential for diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Further studies using a large number of samples are necessary to validate the utility of this panel of proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Ovarian cancer. CLUS and LRG1 biomarkers vs. CA125 alone was evaluated on Distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases (AUC 0.837). The combination of CLUS and LRG1 biomarkers showed improved performance for distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases compared to CA125 alone (AUC 0.837 vs 0.811).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: