Key result
Very brief paroxysms of auricular fibrillation lasting only a few seconds are rarely observed, likely due to diagnostic limitations and the chance nature of electrocardiographic recording.
Highlights the historical recognition and diagnostic challenges of very brief paroxysms of atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine ECGs may miss brief AF paroxysms; leaves open their true prevalence with modern continuous monitoring.
It has become recognized during the last few years that paroxysmal auricular fibrillation is a relatively common disorder, although probably not so frequent as chronic fibrillation. According to the published descriptions of cases, it would appear that the paroxysms usually last hours or days; nevertheless, all clinicians of experience must occasionally have encountered paroxysms lasting only a few minutes, particularly in cases of hyperthyroidism but also occasionally in other forms of cardiac involvement. Very brief paroxysms, not more than a few seconds in duration, have been very rarely observed. This may be due in part to the impossibility of recognizing the nature of such brief paroxysms by ordinary clinical methods and to the fact that unless they recur frequently they are recorded in electrocardiograms by mere chance. A careful search of the literature extending over the period of use of the electrocardiograph in clinical medicine for examples of such fleeting
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles C. Wolferth (1925) conducted a review in Intermittent auricular fibrillation. Very brief paroxysms of auricular fibrillation was evaluated. Very brief paroxysms of auricular fibrillation lasting only a few seconds are rarely observed, likely due to diagnostic limitations and the chance nature of electrocardiographic recording.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: