Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experiences with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-sized renal calculi from a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the patients with moderate-sized renal calculi who underwent micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy between December 2012 and Septermber 2013. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients and 70 renal units underwent microperc procedure. Mean age of patients was 41.4 ± 18.8. The mean stone size was 122 ± 83 mm(2). The operations were performed under spinal anesthesia in 89.7% of the patients. Stone-free rate was 95.7 % (67/70). Clinically significant residual fragments were observed in three patients. The average duration of operation and mean fluoroscopy time was 40 ± 23 min and 108 ± 72 s, respectively. The mean postoperative drop in hemoglobin was 0.95 ± 0.7 while no patient required blood transfusion. Patients were discharged after an average hospitalization time of 27.5 ± 12.4 h. A total of 4 complications (5.7%), including urinary tract infection (Clavien I) in one patient and renal colics requiring stent insertion (Clavien IIIa) in three patients, were observed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Microperc technique is safe, feasible, and efficacious. We suggest that micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be considered for the treatment of moderate-sized renal stones as an alternative to SWL and RIRS failures and also may be considered even primarily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karatağ et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: