Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates that corner placement of fluid viscous dampers maximizes drift reduction in irregular buildings, indicating that damper positioning matters more than total quantity.
Irregular-plan buildings are particularly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage because mass-stiffness eccentricity amplifies torsional response and concentrates deformation in perimeter structural elements. This study investigates the seismic performance of a 10-story L-shaped reinforced concrete building with extreme torsional irregularity (η > 1.4) located in Padang, Indonesia. The numerical model was developed to compare three Fluid Viscous Damper (FVD) placement configuration with a conventional undamped structure as a reference. Nonlinear Time History Analysis was performed using 11 ground-motion records representing shallow crustal, Benioff, and megathrust earthquakes matched with the Padang city design spectrum. Among the evaluated configurations, the corner placement strategy (ESS-A) achieved the highest performance, reducing the maximum inter-story drift ratio in the X direction by approximately 36% while requiring fewer dampers than ESS-C. A per-damper efficiency index, defined as the percentage reduction in inter-story drift divided by the number of installed dampers, was introduced to quantify placement effectiveness. ESS-A dissipated 62.55% of the input energy and achieved an efficiency of 0.881% per damper, whereas ESS-C dissipated 69.16% but achieved only 0.248% per damper. These findings demonstrate that optimized damper placement and parameter efficiency govern seismic performance more effectively than increasing damper quantity in torsionally irregular reinforced concrete buildings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurniawandy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: