Key result
Deviceless data-driven gating extracts cardiac signals in ~82% of routine PET exams with minimal LVEF bias.
Why the study?
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity can cause heart failure, but conventional routine LVEF monitoring requires dedicated cardiac imaging and clinical resources.
Can a deviceless data-driven gating framework accurately extract cardiac motion and estimate LVEF from routine [18F]FDG PET acquisitions compared to echocardiography or MUGA?
Observational (n=169)
Can a deviceless data-driven gating framework accurately extract cardiac motion and estimate LVEF from routine [18F]FDG PET acquisitions compared to echocardiography or MUGA?
A deviceless data-driven gating framework can successfully extract cardiac motion and estimate LVEF from routine [18F]FDG PET scans, offering a potential method for retrospective functional cardiac assessment without additional patient burden.
May enable retrospective LVEF assessment from routine FDG-PET; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity can lead to irreversible heart failure. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is routinely monitored during treatment, but conventional assessment requires dedicated cardiac imaging and clinical resources. This study evaluated a deviceless data-driven gating (DDG) framework for extracting cardiac motion from routine [18F]FDG PET emission data and, secondary, assessed its feasibility for LVEF estimation. Approach. The DDG framework is based on histo images and uses anatomical masking for frequency-domain filtering to obtain the cardiac signals of 169 [18F]FDG PET/CT examinations. The cardiac gating performance was evaluated, and LVEF estimates were compared with the patient's respective clinical reference method; echocardiography or multigated acquisition (MUGA). Main results. The DDG framework successfully extracted a cardiac gating signal in 138 of 169 examinations (81.7%). Sufficient myocardial [18F]FDG uptake for software-based LVEF estimation was present in 101 patients (60%), and LVEF was successfully estimated in all cases. Compared with the reference methods, the DDG-based LVEF estimates demonstrated a mean bias of 3.4% relative to echocardiography and -2.6% relative to MUGA. Agreement was strongest with echocardiography, although the limits of agreement exceeded the threshold required for interchangeable clinical use. The extracted pulse frequencies were physiologically plausible and showed good agreement with the corresponding reference examinations, supporting the validity of the DDG-derived cardiac signal. Significance. The deviceless DDG framework can successfully extract clinically relevant cardiac motion directly from routine [18F]FDG PET acquisitions without external hardware. The method achieved a high success rate with respect to gating the images and provided LVEF estimates that showed good agreement with established clinical reference methods, supporting the feasibility of deriving functional cardiac information from standard PET examinations. The proposed approach provides a promising foundation for retrospective functional cardiac assessment and has the potential to complement conventional LVEF evaluation while reducing additional patient burden and simplifying clinical workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Overbeck et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing routine [18F]FDG PET/CT (n=169). Deviceless data-driven gating (DDG) framework vs. Echocardiography or MUGA was evaluated on Successful extraction of a cardiac gating signal. A deviceless data-driven gating framework successfully extracted a cardiac gating signal in 81.7% of routine [18F]FDG PET examinations, yielding LVEF estimates with a 3.4% mean bias versus echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Physics in Medicine and Biology