Qualitative study demonstrates adaptive public administration in Indonesian foreign aid, highlighting South-South and Triangular Cooperation as an alternative development model.
This article analyzes Indonesia's role as an emerging donor, providing foreign aid through South‐South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTC). To move beyond the typical debate between radical and reformist views on foreign aid, it adopts a “radical reform” approach that blends both perspectives. Employing qualitative methods, including elite interviews, the study investigates how Indonesia, as an emerging donor, embodies a radical reform strategy, showcasing adaptive public administration in shaping international development policies. The article posits that SSTC offers a strategic alternative to traditional aid models, presenting Indonesia's approach as a practical, mutually beneficial framework for international cooperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iswardhana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: