Key result
A one-step triplex RT-PCR demonstrated high concordance (100%, 97.6%, and 94.4%) with conventional individual RT-PCR for detecting PEDV, PSV, and SaV in 402 piglet diarrhea samples.
Why the study?
Swine diarrhea can be caused by multiple agents, including PEDV, PSV, and SaV.
Does a one-step triplex RT-PCR method accurately detect PEDV, PSV, and SaV in piglet diarrhea samples compared to conventional individual RT-PCR?
Does a one-step triplex RT-PCR method accurately detect PEDV, PSV, and SaV in piglet diarrhea samples compared to conventional individual RT-PCR?
A novel one-step triplex RT-PCR method demonstrates high concordance with conventional individual RT-PCR for the rapid detection of PEDV, PSV, and SaV in piglet diarrhea samples.
Provides multiplex swine virus detection; leaves open clinical validation and routine adoption.
Swine diarrhea can be caused by multiple agents, including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine sapelovirus (PSV), and porcine sapovirus (SaV). We designed a one-step triplex reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) detection method including 3 pairs of primers that focused on the S1 gene of PEDV, a conserved gene of PSV, and the VP1 gene of SaV. The optimal concentrations of upstream and downstream primers in the triplex RT-PCR were 0.24 μM for PEDV, 0.15 μM for PSV, and 0.2 μM for SaV, and the optimal annealing temperature was 55.5°C. Triplex RT-PCR assessment of 402 piglet diarrhea samples was compared with conventional individual RT-PCR. Concordance rates in both tests for individual viruses were 100%, 97.6%, and 94.4% for PEDV, PSV, and SaV, respectively. PEDV, PSV, and SaV were detected in 57.2%, 10.4%, and 9.0% of the samples, respectively. The high sensitivity and specificity of this triplex RT-PCR–based detection method for PEDV, PSV, and SaV could allow rapid detection and analysis of mixed infections by these 3 viruses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2019) studied Swine diarrhea (PEDV, PSV, and SaV) (n=402). One-step triplex reverse-transcription PCR vs. Conventional individual RT-PCR was evaluated on Concordance rates with conventional individual RT-PCR for PEDV, PSV, and SaV. A one-step triplex RT-PCR demonstrated high concordance (100%, 97.6%, and 94.4%) with conventional individual RT-PCR for detecting PEDV, PSV, and SaV in 402 piglet diarrhea samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: