Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis proposes a fairness-based climate burden distribution model among societal actors, indicating that integrating justice enhances public policy acceptance.
We propose a normative framework for distributing the responsibility for national climate mitigation efforts among societal actors. The framework aims to inform national policy, emphasizing how justice considerations – alongside efficiency – can enhance public acceptance of climate policies. We argue that forward-looking responsibility depends on three factors: backward-looking responsibility, benefiting from harmful activities and capacity to mitigate emissions. For backward-looking responsibility we build on a novel account of causality, allowing us to grade actors’ causal contributions, even though climate change is characterized by overdetermination. Using electricity production as an illustration, we show how the proposed framework can help inform fair climate policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: