Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates 98% methylene blue removal using a zinc-doped mesoporous silica composite under UV irradiation, highlighting a scalable approach for wastewater remediation.
Mesoporous silica (MS) is an excellent adsorbent for removing methylene blue (MB) in solution. However, the adsorption process only transfers mass from the solution to the MS surface, leading to adsorbent saturation and a disposal issue for solid waste. To address this, zinc (Zn) at 10–30% (w/w) was incorporated onto the MS surface to generate a synergistic photocatalyst-adsorbent for MB removal. Adding Zn species to the surface of MS generates a mixed phase of Zn 2 SiO 4 and ZnO, indicating good dispersion of Zn species during impregnation. Consequently, the surface area of MS is reduced due to the utilisation of uncalcined MS during impregnation, thereby inhibiting pore blockage by Zn species. FTIR analysis revealed several essential functional groups, including the internal symmetric vibration of Si-O-Si at 1084 cm − 1 and the stretching vibration of Si-OH at 960 cm − 1 . SEM imaging uncovered a worm-like microcrystallite. The impregnated MS exhibited the highest surface area, 414.5 m 2 /g, among the 30ZnO-Zn 2 SiO 4 /MS samples. The highest band gap was observed for 10ZnO-Zn 2 SiO 4 /MS, at 4.69 eV. Notably, the structure of MS is retained even after impregnation, indicating good stability. Such features promote efficient MB removal under UV-LED irradiation over the MB concentration range of 50–90 mg·L − 1 . 20ZnO-Zn 2 SiO 4 /MS demonstrated the highest photocatalytic-adsorption performance with an efficiency of 98% (after 90 min irradiation) using 50 mg·L − 1 MB solution at a pH solution of 9 and a dosage of 12.5 mg. The stability test of 20ZnO-Zn 2 SiO 4 /MS confirmed that 20ZnO-Zn 2 SiO 4 /MS showed a modest stability test of the photocatalytic-adsorption process. This finding provides insight into optimising the generation of an integrated photocatalyst-adsorbent for wastewater removal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habiddin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: