Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) monotherapy was used as salvage treatment in 55 neutropenic patients (58 fever episodes) after treatment failure on first-line antibiotic therapy. Successful antibiotic treatment was defined as eradication of all signs, symptoms and microbiologic evidence of infection on I/C monotherapy alone. Twenty-five out of the 58 episodes (43%) were classified as success, 6 episodes (10%) as initial response but the regimen had to be modified (amphotericin B was added) and 27 episodes (47%) as failures. In episodes with documented infections 9 out of 23 (39%) were classified as success. All patients survived during the first 72 hours after change to I/C therapy. One patient had to discontinue I/C due to a skin rash. In conclusion, the use of a treatment algorithm with I/C monotherapy as second-line treatment was safe and effective. Other antimicrobial agents, most often vancomycin and/or amphotericin B, had to be added in half of the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engervall et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: