Progress report reveals critical limits of intelligent automation in GIScience, highlighting four commitments to guide responsible and reflexive geographic knowledge production.
GeoAI’s rapid expansion makes renewed attention to slowness in GIScience necessary. Situating GeoAI within GIScience’s longer history of automation, this progress report revisits fast and slow geographic knowledge production and develops slow GIS as a critical orientation to intelligent automation. Drawing on critical, feminist, Indigenous, participatory, disability, and minor GISciences, I propose four commitments—relevance, reflexivity, relationality, and responsibility—that guide attention to moments that should not be automated too quickly, from framing problems and assembling data to interpreting results, mobilizing knowledge, and tracing consequences. I conclude by considering systemic changes needed to sustain slow GIS within contemporary research systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victoria Fast (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: