Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative interview study reveals complex boundary-making strategies among middle-class South Asian migrants in Saudi Arabia, highlighting intersectional stratification in exclusionary regimes.
This article examines how middle-class South Asian migrants make sense of their belonging in Saudi Arabia, a country where citizenship is ethnocratic, gendered and highly restricted for migrants. Drawing on narrative interviews with first and second-generation Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis settled with their families in the Kingdom, it argues that these migrants do not subvert the ethno-national hierarchies that place them below Saudi nationals but deploy boundary-making strategies to navigate their social locations across gender, ethnicity, class and profession. While Gulf migration scholarship has foregrounded the citizen/non-citizen divide, this article shows that boundary-making operates at two connected levels. At the inter-group level, restricted citizenship and a segmented labour market sustain an enduring boundary between Saudis and migrants. At the intra-group level, middle-class South Asians draw distinctions among themselves, separating their educated and professional selves from low-wage co-ethnic workers. Shared religion is double-edged: Islam offers belonging that can cross ethnic lines yet also becomes a site of boundary-making between Saudi and South Asian ways of being Muslim. Understanding these processes through translocational positionality, the article calls for a more intersectional understanding of how migrants navigate stratification in exclusionary migration regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Areej Jamal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: