Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Secondary analysis reveals distinct error drivers across medication workflow stages in community pharmacies, highlighting priority targets for improving dispensing safety.
The types and causes of dispensing errors vary across the stages of the complex dispensing process in community pharmacies. Notably, the analysis of near-miss reports may facilitate improvements in healthcare environments and operational practices. We aimed to identify the characteristics of the factors contributing to near-miss errors at each stage of the dispensing process and to determine which factors require priority action. We conducted a secondary analysis of near-miss dispensing errors voluntarily reported by community pharmacies through the near-miss reporting system of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. The associations between various types of near-miss errors and their contributing factors were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models. Among the 45,483 near-miss incidents, most were reported during the dispensing and accuracy-checking stages (n = 35,384, 77.8%). At the prescription data entry stage, near-miss errors were primarily associated with the usability of computer systems and look-alike/sound-alike (LASA) drug names. At the dispensing and accuracy-checking stage, the characteristic contributing factors included LASA drug names and similar appearances, patient preferences for brand name/generic, user-friendliness of equipment, and human factors among pharmacists. During the medicine supply stage, factors associated with inadequate confirmation of the patient’s understanding were identified. Finally, at the post-supply stage, patient-related factors and insufficient communication were identified as key contributors. Based on the reported near-miss events, priority actions are required to address LASA drug names and similar appearances, generic prescription systems, labour-intensive dispensing practices, the usability of computer systems and equipment, and inadequate communication with patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: