Cross-sectional survey finds highest adoption of AI emotional support tools among adolescents, highlighting the need for age-tailored safety guardrails.
This study examined age-related differences in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for emotional support using survey data from 3,597 respondents recruited through Mental Health America. Chi-square analyses showed that adoption and frequency of AI-based emotional support varied significantly by age, with adolescents under 18 reporting the highest use and adults aged 25 and older reporting lower-than-expected use. Common motivations among users included convenience, 24/7 availability, comfort talking to a bot, free access, and the ability to seek help without informing family members. Non-users most often cited a preference for human support, distrust of AI advice, and privacy concerns. Findings suggest that AI’s non-human nature can both reduce stigma and increase concerns about trust and authenticity. Human-centered systems should therefore provide age-appropriate safety guardrails, transparent limitations, privacy protections, and clear pathways to human support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: