Key result
Sabin LSc2ab Type 1 attenuated poliovirus successfully infected and immunized infants despite concurrent ECHO 14 virus, and spread to 66% of unvaccinated infant contacts.
Why the study?
Does concurrent ECHO 14 virus infection affect the acquisition of infection and immunity to Sabin Type 1 attenuated poliovirus in susceptible infants?
Does concurrent ECHO 14 virus infection affect the acquisition of infection and immunity to Sabin Type 1 attenuated poliovirus in susceptible infants?
Concurrent enteric infection with ECHO 14 virus does not significantly interfere with the infectivity or immunogenicity of the Sabin Type 1 oral polio vaccine in infants.
Concurrent ECHO 14 may not impair Sabin Type 1 OPV immunogenicity in infants; supports evaluation of oral vaccine performance during enteric coinfections.
Twenty-five babies fully susceptible to poliovirus, and dwelling in an infant home, were fed Sabin LSc2ab Type 1 attenuated poliovirus. Although 40% of the infant population was infected concurrently with ECHO 14 virus, little effect was noted upon either acquisition of infection with attenuated poliovirus or the development of immunity to it. Sixty-six per cent of the unvaccinated infants who were studied became infected with poliovirus, and some were noted to excrete it for as long as 2 months. Poliovirus persisted in the institution for at least 3 months following the last feeding of vaccine. No illness could be attributed to the ECHO 14 virus, and little immunologic response was demonstrated to this virus in the study population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ingram et al. (1962) studied Susceptible to poliovirus (n=25). Sabin LSc2ab Type 1 attenuated poliovirus vs. Unvaccinated infants was evaluated on Acquisition of infection with attenuated poliovirus. Sabin LSc2ab Type 1 attenuated poliovirus successfully infected and immunized infants despite concurrent ECHO 14 virus, and spread to 66% of unvaccinated infant contacts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: