Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use current loyalty market landscape data to examine differences in loyalty‐program participation among key consumer segments. Design/methodology/approach Using data from the Loyalty Census research study conducted by COLLOQUY (JCM v24i5), this paper applies the information to six demographic segments of high interest to loyalty‐marketing practitioners – affluent, young adult, senior, core women, emerging Hispanic, and general adult – to determine rends related to participation, needs, redemption, and satisfaction. Findings The paper identifies the emergence of underserved and important demographic segments looking for attention in the world of loyalty marketing. The paper also establishes the new battlegrounds for loyalty programs in regards to rewards and redemption. Finally, the research reveals fresh strategies for marketers designing loyalty offerings. Practical implications Personalization is key to driving participation in contemporary loyalty marketing programs. Companies must identify the individual and tailor rewards, offers and benefits ‐ constructing a “difference engine” to serve all markets, build advocacy, retention and return on investment. Originality/value The paper further deconstructs the current loyalty marketing landscape and spotlights budding demographic segments previously overlooked or understudied. The text derives ten concrete suggestions from the data for building successful loyalty programs in today's changing market.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferguson et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: