Key result
A multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine against FMDV type O elicited high antibody titers in swine, conferring complete protection against challenge, comparable to the traditional vaccine (P > 0.05).
p-value: p=> 0.05
May offer swine FMDV vaccine alternative; leaves open field validation before any practice change.
In order to develop a completely safe immunogen to replace the traditional inactivated vaccine, a tandem-repeat multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus (FMDV) type O was developed. It contained three copies each of residues 141 to 160 and 200 to 213 of VP1 of the O/China/99 strain of FMDV coupled with a swine immunoglobulin G heavy-chain constant region (scIgG). The data showed that the multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine elicited high titers of anti-FMDV specific antibodies in swine at 30 days postvaccination (dpv) and conferred complete protection against a challenge with 10³ 50% swine infective doses of the O/China/99 strain. The anti-FMDV specific antibody titers were not significantly different between the multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine and the traditional vaccine (t test, P > 0.05). The number of 50% pig protective doses was 6.47, which is higher than the number recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health. The multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine resulted in a duration of immunity of at least 6 months. We speculate that the multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine is a promising vaccine that may replace the traditional inactivated vaccine for the prevention and control of FMD in swine in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2010) studied Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus type O. Multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine against FMDV type O vs. Traditional inactivated vaccine was evaluated on Anti-FMDV specific antibody titers (p=> 0.05). A multiple-epitope recombinant vaccine against FMDV type O elicited high antibody titers in swine, conferring complete protection against challenge, comparable to the traditional vaccine (P > 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: