Key result
The presence of an ophthalmic artery collateral pathway did not significantly influence cerebrovascular reactivity in the middle cerebral artery compared to anterograde flow (26.1% vs 29.0%, p=0.65).
Why the study?
Does the presence of an ophthalmic artery collateral pathway influence hemispheric cerebral hemodynamics in patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis?
Cohort (n=50)
Does the presence of an ophthalmic artery collateral pathway influence hemispheric cerebral hemodynamics in patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis?
The presence of an ophthalmic collateral pathway does not significantly influence hemispheric cerebral hemodynamics in patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis.
Ophthalmic collaterals do not appear to influence middle cerebral artery reactivity in carotid stenosis; leaves open their role in hemispheric hemodynamics.
The role of ophthalmic artery collateral pathway in hemispheric hemodynamics in patients with severe carotid stenosis is controversial. The aim of the present study was to address this question comparing the asymmetry of the velocity in middle and anterior cerebral arteries (MCAs and ACAs) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in MCA on stenotic side in the patients with unilateral severe stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with and without ophthalmic artery collateral pathway. The cohort of 118 patients with carotid stenosis was prospectively assembled. Fifty patients who had severe unilateral ICA stenosis (71%-99%) by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) were observed by transcranial Doppler (TCD). Cerebral blood flow velocity in MCA and ACA in both sides, direction of blood flow in ophthalmic artery (OA) and CVR on the side of stenosis were determined. There were 14 patients with retrograde blood flow in OA (Group I). The remaining 36 patients with anterograde flow in OA composed Group II. The degree of interarterial asymmetry of peak and mean velocity (Vpeak and Vmean) in MCA and ACA and CVR in MCA were compared in both groups. The degree of ACA asymmetry by Vpeak was 44.0% +/- 6.9% in Group I and 38.3% +/- 3.9% in Group II (p = 0.49), by Vmean 40.3% +/- 6.7% and 36.6% +/- 3.8% (p = 0.63) respectively. The degree of MCA asymmetry by Vpeak was 24.2% +/- 2.8% in Group I and 19.5% +/- 5.0% in Group II (p = 0.42), by Vmean 23.5% +/- 2.9% and 20.6% +/- 5.1% (p = 0.63) respectively. CVR in Group I was 26.1% +/- 6.1%, in Group II 29.0% +/- 6.7% (p = 0.65). The ophthalmic collateral pathway has no influence on hemispheric cerebral hemodynamics in patients with severe unilateral carotid stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Telman et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Severe unilateral carotid stenosis (n=50). Ophthalmic artery collateral pathway (retrograde flow) vs. No ophthalmic artery collateral pathway (anterograde flow) was evaluated on Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the middle cerebral artery (p=0.65). The presence of an ophthalmic artery collateral pathway did not significantly influence cerebrovascular reactivity in the middle cerebral artery compared to anterograde flow (26.1% vs 29.0%, p=0.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: