Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1974CirculationOpen Access

Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Testing and Continuous Monitoring for Detecting Arrhythmias in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does continuous ECG monitoring improve the detection of significant arrhythmias compared to submaximal treadmill exercise testing in patients with previous myocardial infarction?

Population

60 patients with previous myocardial infarction

Comparison

10 hours of continuous ECG monitoring during… vs Submaximal treadmill exercise testing

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

Michael H. CrawfordMichael H. CrawfordUniversity College DublinRORobert A. O’RourkeCardiac ImagingNRNallan C. RamakrishnaUniversity of California, San Diego

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May detect more serious arrhythmias than treadmill testing post-MI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Structured PICO

Does continuous ECG monitoring improve the detection of significant arrhythmias compared to submaximal treadmill exercise testing in patients with previous myocardial infarction?

P
Population
60 patients with previous myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
10 hours of continuous ECG monitoring (Holter technique) during normal activity
C
Comparator
Submaximal treadmill exercise testing
O
Outcome
Detection of significant arrhythmiassurrogate

Continuous ECG monitoring is more effective than submaximal treadmill exercise testing for detecting serious arrhythmias in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Cite This Study

Crawford et al. (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9e8d179ee9f07baff6c597https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.50.2.301
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share