Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wave data near coasts estimated from high-frequency (HF) radar are inter-compared with in situ and model-predicted wave data. The comparisons are useful since the in situ wave data are limited to the main wave parameters and the observation is limited to a single point. The agreement between in situ and model-predicted wave heights is reasonable, considering the accuracy of the model input wind. The agreement between radar-estimated and model-predicted wave energy in the intermediate frequency band, which is the most energetic frequency band, is better than that in the low- or high-frequency bands. On the other hand, the agreement between the radar-estimated and model-predicted wave direction is best in the high-frequency band, which is the band closest to the Bragg frequency. The spatial distribution of the radar-estimated wave heights during the observation period is similar to that of the model-predicted wave height in the limited area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yukiharu Hisaki (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: