Key result
Administration of angiotensin I or II increased drinking rates in rainbow trout fry to about 4-5 mL kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, a response significantly inhibited by saralasin and enalapril.
Why the study?
Does the administration of angiotensin I, angiotensin II, and their inhibitors affect the drinking rate in freshwater-adapted rainbow trout fry?
Does the administration of angiotensin I, angiotensin II, and their inhibitors affect the drinking rate in freshwater-adapted rainbow trout fry?
The study provides further evidence that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in the control of drinking in juvenile freshwater fish.
Supports RAS role in fish osmoregulation; extends comparative data but leaves clinical translation open.
Drinking in freshwater-adapted rainbow trout fry was investigated in response to the administration of angiotensin I, angiotensin II, the angiotensin II antagonist saralasin, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Rainbow trout fry (0. 8-1.5 g), as previously shown, drank at a rate of about 0.7-0.9 mL kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ in freshwater, and the intramuscular administration of angiotensin I or angiotensin II increased drinking rates maximally to about 4-5 mL kg⁻¹ h-1', while intraperitoneal injections at a similar dose were less potent. Intramuscular administration of increasing levels of angiotensin II (0.2-2 nmol g⁻¹ of [Asn¹, Val⁵]-angiotensin II) resulted in a dose-dependent increase of drinking rate, and this response was partially but significantly inhibited by the administration of the angiotensin II receptor blocker saralasin ([Sar¹, Val⁵, Ala⁸]-angiotensin II). Drinking rates were also increased (maximally to about 5 mL kg⁻¹ h⁻¹) in response to intramuscular injection of increasing levels of angiotensin I, with maximum responses between 0.26 and 0.35 nmol⁻¹ g, and this response was significantly lowered by the administration of enalapril and by saralasin. The administration of losartan (DuP 753), a selective inhibitor of the receptor subtype AT, in mammals, had an inconsistent effect on drinking in freshwater and seawater-adapted fish. Although the role of drinking in juvenile freshwater fish is not understood, the present results constitute further evidence for the involvement of the renin-angiotensin system in control of drinking in fish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuentes et al. (1996) studied this question. Angiotensin I and Angiotensin II vs. Baseline was evaluated on Drinking rate. Administration of angiotensin I or II increased drinking rates in rainbow trout fry to about 4-5 mL kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, a response significantly inhibited by saralasin and enalapril.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: