Key result
Dose-escalated FEC caused significantly greater subclinical cardiac damage (median heart-to-lung ratio 1.98) compared to three cycles of FEC followed by high-dose CTCb (1.51) or CMF (1.44).
Why the study?
Does dose-escalated FEC cause more subclinical myocardial damage compared to standard FEC with high-dose CTCb or CMF in breast cancer patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Single-blind
Random sampling from follow-up patients
No
Does dose-escalated FEC cause more subclinical myocardial damage compared to standard FEC with high-dose CTCb or CMF in breast cancer patients?
Dose-escalated epirubicin-based chemotherapy is associated with significantly greater subclinical myocardial damage compared to standard-dose epirubicin followed by high-dose alkylating agents or non-anthracycline regimens.
Dose-escalated FEC was associated with greater subclinical cardiac damage; hypothesis-generating for anthracycline dosing and surveillance in breast cancer.
We compared adjuvant chemotherapy-related myocardial damage by antimyosin scintigraphy in patients who received either nine cycles of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) where the doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide were escalated according to the leucocyte nadir (group I, n = 14), three cycles of FEC followed by high-dose chemotherapy with alkylating agents (CTCb) given with the support of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (group II, n = 14), or six cycles of standard intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil; group III, n = 8). The cardiac uptake of In-111-antimyosin-Fab (R11D10) antibody was measured and the heart-to-lung ratio (HLR) calculated 8-36 months after the last dose of chemotherapy. Cardiac antimyosin antibody uptake was considerably higher among patients treated with nine cycles of dose-escalated FEC than among those who were treated with three cycles of FEC and high-dose CTCb (HLR, median 1.98; range 1.36-2.24 vs median 1.51; range 1.20-1.82; P < 0.001), or those treated with CMF (median 1.44; range 1.15-1.68; P < 0.001). The difference between groups II and III was not significant (P > 0.1). A linear association was found between the cumulative dose of epirubicin and the cardiac antimyosin uptake (P < 0.001). We conclude that subclinical cardiac damage caused by three cycles of conventional-dose FEC followed by one cycle of high-dose CTCb chemotherapy is small as compared with the damage caused by dose-escalated FEC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erselcan et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Breast cancer (n=36). Dose-escalated FEC vs. High-dose chemotherapy (FEC x3 + CTCb) or CMF was evaluated on Cardiac antimyosin antibody uptake (Heart-to-lung ratio) (p=<0.001). Dose-escalated FEC caused significantly greater subclinical cardiac damage (median heart-to-lung ratio 1.98) compared to three cycles of FEC followed by high-dose CTCb (1.51) or CMF (1.44).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: