Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Sclerotherapy is popular for the treatment of lower extremity telangiectasias and varicose and reticular veins. Although a large number of sclerosants are commonly employed, there are few data that directly compare their advantages and drawbacks. OBJECTIVES: To analyze and present the differences between sclerosants that make them more or less suitable agents in specific clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systemic review of published medical literature that compares and contrasts different classes of sclerosants is presented. RESULTS: There is no perfect sclerosant that is complication free and 100% effective. The ability to match the sclerosant to the clinical problem being approached makes the availability of more Food and Drug Administration-approved sclerosants appealing. CONCLUSION: Modern sclerosants that have been subjected to rigorous experimental and clinical trials will provide even more efficacious and safer patient treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David M. Duffy (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: