Key result
The prevalence of Type D personality was significantly higher in participants with chronic illness (53%) compared to healthy controls (39%), with negative affectivity serving as a strong predictor of health outcomes.
Why the study?
Does Type D personality influence health behaviours, social support, and symptom severity across different chronic illnesses?
Cross-Sectional (n=389)
Does Type D personality influence health behaviours, social support, and symptom severity across different chronic illnesses?
Type D personality, particularly negative affectivity, is more prevalent in chronic illness and predicts health behaviors and symptom severity across different conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Type D screening via NA/SI subscales may refine risk stratification in chronic illness; leaves open causality and intervention effects.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to develop a predictive model of how Type D personality influences health behaviours, social support and symptom severity and assess its generalisability to a range of chronic illnesses. DESIGN: Participants were classified as either healthy (n = 182) or having a chronic illness (n = 207). Participants completed an online survey measuring Type D and a range of health-related variables. Chronic illness participants were classified as having either a functional somatic syndrome (i.e. chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia), where the underlying pathological processes were unclear, or illnesses such as type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, where the causes are well understood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were health behaviours, social support and both physical and psychological symptoms. RESULTS: The rate of Type D was higher in chronic illness participants (53%) than in healthy controls (39%). Negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI) both correlated with outcome measures, although NA was generally the stronger predictor. Using NA and SI as independent subscales led to superior prediction of health outcomes than using categorical or continuous representations. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the relationship between Type D and health outcomes may generalise across different chronic illnesses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horwood et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic illness (functional somatic syndrome or illnesses of known etiology) (n=389). Chronic illness vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Prevalence of Type D personality (p=0.02). The prevalence of Type D personality was significantly higher in participants with chronic illness (53%) compared to healthy controls (39%), with negative affectivity serving as a strong predictor of health outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: