Key result
The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent demonstrates favorable safety and efficacy in clinical trials and usual practice compared with bare metal stents and alternative drug-eluting stents.
Why the study?
Does the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor coronary stent improve safety and efficacy compared with bare metal stents and alternative drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization?
Does the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor coronary stent improve safety and efficacy compared with bare metal stents and alternative drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization?
The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent offers a favorable balance of safety and efficacy, addressing concerns of late stent thrombosis seen with first-generation drug-eluting stents.
Supports Endeavor stent in PCI; extends Level 5 data but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Given statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization, treatment with drug-eluting stents (DESs) has become established as a standard of care in percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, despite their superior efficacy compared with conventional bare metal stents, experiences with first-generation DESs from both clinical trials and real-world practice have raised attention to the late safety risk of stent thrombosis that may be related to biologic incompatibility, delayed vessel healing and/or impaired endothelial function. To address the outstanding needs related to DES safety and deliverability while maintaining efficacy, the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (Medtronic CardioVascular, CA, USA) is distinguished by favorable safety and efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials and usual practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the mechanical and pharmacologic features of the Endeavor stent, provide an overview of comparative trial results of the Endeavor stent with bare metal stents and alternative DESs, and detail recent and developing trials specific to the Endeavor stent that provide further insight to stent biocompatibility and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David E. Kandzari (2010) conducted a review in percutaneous coronary revascularization. Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. bare metal stents and alternative DESs was evaluated. The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent demonstrates favorable safety and efficacy in clinical trials and usual practice compared with bare metal stents and alternative drug-eluting stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: