Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two type of nanocomposites—an immiscible blend, high density polyethylene/polyamide 6 (HDPE/PA‐6) with organomodified clay, and a compatibilized blend, high density polyethylene grafted with acrylic acid/PA‐6 (PEAA/PA‐6) with organomodified clay—were prepared via melt compounding. X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy results revealed that the clay was intercalated and partially exfoliated. Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy has been utilized to investigate the free‐volume hole properties of two type of nanocomposites. The results show a negative deviation of free‐volume size in PEAA/PA‐6 blend, and a positive deviation in HDPE/PA‐6 blend, and I3 has a greater negative deviation in compatibilized blend than in immiscible blend due to interaction between dissimilar chains. For nanocomposites based on polymer blends, in immiscible HDPE/PA‐6/organomodified clay system, the variation of free‐volume size with clay content is not obvious and the free‐volume concentration and fraction decreased. While in the case of compatibilized PEAA/PA‐6/organomodified clay nanocomposites, complicated variation of free‐volume properties due to interactions between two phases and organomodified clay was observed. And the interaction parameter β shows the interactions between polymers and organomodified clay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: