Key result
SYT-SSX detection by FISH (96.7% in known cases) is comparable to or higher than RT-PCR (94.7%), making it highly useful for the final diagnosis of potential synovial sarcomas.
Why the study?
Does the detection of SYT-SSX by RT-PCR and FISH accurately diagnose synovial sarcoma in known and potential cases?
Cross-Sectional (n=255)
Does the detection of SYT-SSX by RT-PCR and FISH accurately diagnose synovial sarcoma in known and potential cases?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.7% vs 94.7%
FISH is comparable to or more efficient than RT-PCR for detecting SYT-SSX, making both methods highly useful for the definitive diagnosis of potential synovial sarcomas.
Supports FISH/RT-PCR for synovial sarcoma diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of SYT-SSX detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for synovial sarcoma (SS) in known and potential cases. SYT-SSX was analyzed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 62 known SS, 60 non-SS and 133 potential SS by RT-PCR and FISH. FISH was mainly performed on a tissue microarray with some modifications. SYT-SSX was detected in 94.7% (54/57) of known SS and 70.5% (86/122) of potential SS by RT-PCR and in 96.7% (58/60) of known SS and 78.1% (100/128) of potential SS by FISH. Moreover, SYT-SSX was negative in 100% (58/58) of non-SS by RT-PCR and in 100% (59/59) of non-SS by FISH. Accordingly, SYT-SSX was detected in 106 potential SS by RT-PCR or FISH, including 80 cases manifested by both methods, 20 specimens verified only by FISH and 6 samples confirmed only by RT-PCR. Clinical findings and immunohistochemistry data were analyzed in potential SS with final molecular diagnosis. The positive ratio of cytokeratin (CK) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) in finally diagnosed SS was 51.9% (55/106) and 61.3% (65/106), respectively. Except EMA, clinical parameters (age, sex, tumor size, tumor sites) and other immunohistochemistry indexes (CK, S-100, neurone specific enolase (NSE), CD99, myoglobin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), cluster of differentiation (CD) 68 and mesothelial cell) had no significant difference between finally diagnosed SS and non-SS. It is indicated that the efficiency of FISH is comparable to or even higher than that of RT-PCR for SYT-SSX detection. The detection of SYT-SSX by RT-PCR or FISH is very useful for the final diagnosis of potential synovial sarcomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Synovial sarcoma (n=255). SYT-SSX detection by FISH and RT-PCR was evaluated on Detection of SYT-SSX in known synovial sarcoma. SYT-SSX detection by FISH (96.7% in known cases) is comparable to or higher than RT-PCR (94.7%), making it highly useful for the final diagnosis of potential synovial sarcomas.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: