Why the study?
Do newer surgical ablation techniques using alternative energy sources achieve similar rates of normal sinus rhythm restoration compared to the traditional cut-and-sew maze III procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=79)
Yes
Do newer surgical ablation techniques using alternative energy sources achieve similar rates of normal sinus rhythm restoration compared to the traditional cut-and-sew maze III procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=NS
Newer surgical ablation techniques using alternative energy sources such as radiofrequency and cryothermy appear to achieve similar rates of normal sinus rhythm restoration as the traditional cut-and-sew maze III procedure.
BACKGROUND: New alternatives exist using various energy sources and lesion lines for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of these options compared to the cut-and-sew maze III procedure is unknown. METHODS: From August 1996 to August 2003, 79 patients have undergone a procedure for AF, with 70 patients currently more than 3 months postsurgery. The patients (58 continuous, 12 paroxysmal) underwent a surgical procedure for AF, lone AF (12) and with concomitant procedures (58). Techniques included cut and sew (23), bipolar radiofrequency (RF) (28) and unipolar-RF (10), and cryothermy (9). Lesions included maze III (46), pulmonary vein isolation (16), and pulmonary vein isolation plus mitral annular connecting line only (8). RESULTS: Follow-up was complete in 58 (83%) of 70 patients at a mean time of 595 +/- 750 days (range, 24-2530 days). The operative mortality was 0% in lone AF patients and 7.1% (5/70) in patients undergoing concomitant procedures. Need for perioperative pacemaker was 22.9%. Overall, normal sinus rhythm (NSR) was restored in 82.7% of patients, with success in 83.3% (10/12) lone procedures and 82.6% (38/46) concomitant procedures ( P = NS); the rate of continuous AF was 85.1% (40/47) and SR with paroxysmal fibrillation was 72.7% (8/11) ( P = NS). Traditional maze was successful in 80.6% (29/36) patients, pulmonary vein isolation was successful 93.3% (14/15), and left-sided maze in 71.4% (5/7) ( P = NS). Cut and sew procedures were successful in 88.2% (15/17), RF-bipolar in 84.0% (21/25), RFunipolar in 77.8% (7/9), and cryothermy in 71.4% (5/7) ( P = NS). Energy source, lesion set, AF duration, and lone/concomitant procedure were the factors subjected to logistic regression analysis. No factors were predictive of achieving postoperative NSR. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience with newer surgical techniques employing different energy sources and fewer incision lines suggests that the success rate may approach the results obtained with traditional cut-and-sew Cox-maze III procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=79). Alternative surgical ablation techniques (radiofrequency, cryothermy) vs. Cut-and-sew Cox-maze III procedure was evaluated on Restoration of normal sinus rhythm (p=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: