Why the study?
Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation has evolved with new energy sources and better pathophysiological understanding, but long-term outcomes and minimally invasive approaches require further evaluation.
Surgery of atrial fibrillation (AF) was first described in 1991 by James Cox in what was named the Cox-Maze procedure, and over the years it has been considered the gold-standard treatment, with best results in maintaining sinus rhythm in the long term. Nevertheless, the complexity and aggressivity of the first techniques of cut-and-sew limited the application of this procedure, and few centers were dedicated to AF surgery. In the past years, however, new devices able to ablate atrial tissue with cryotherapy, radiofrequency, or ultrasounds have facilitated this operation. In the mid-term, other energy devices with laser or microwave have been abandoned due to a lack of consistency in getting transmural lesions in a consistent and reproducible manner. Additionally, better knowledge of the physiopathology of AF, with the importance of triggering zones around the pulmonary veins, has started new minimally invasive techniques to approach paroxysmal and persistent AF patients through thoracoscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandoval et al. (2011) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Surgical treatment was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: