Key result
In healthy volunteers who did not respond to a fluid challenge, the portal vein pulsatility index significantly increased from 32% to 48% (p=0.027), indicating potential early venous congestion.
Why the study?
High portal vein pulsatility index is linked to adverse outcomes in perioperative or critically ill patients, but data on dynamic changes related to fluid infusion are scarce.
Does a 500 ml fluid challenge alter the portal vein pulsatility index and portal blood flow in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=24)
Single-blind (echocardiography reader blinded to MRI data)
No
Does a 500 ml fluid challenge alter the portal vein pulsatility index and portal blood flow in healthy volunteers?
Portal vein pulsatility index assessed by MRI increases significantly in healthy subjects who do not respond to a fluid challenge, suggesting its potential as an early marker of venous congestion.
PI rise after fluid challenge may flag early congestion in non-responders; hypothesis-generating for bedside assessment in critically ill patients.
High values of the portal vein pulsatility index (PI) have been associated with adverse outcomes in perioperative or critically ill patients. However, data on dynamic changes of PI related to fluid infusion are scarce. We aimed to determine if dynamic changes in PI are associated with the fluid challenge (FC). To address this challenge, we conducted a prospective single-center study. The population study included healthy subjects. FC consisted in the administration of 500 ml of Ringer lactate infusion over 5 min. The portal blood flow and PI were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. The responsiveness to FC was defined as an increase in the cardiac stroke volume of at least 10% as assessed by echocardiography. We included 24 healthy volunteers. A total of fourteen (58%) subjects were responders, and 10 (42%) were non-responders. In the responder group, FC induced a significant increase in portal blood flow from 881 (762–1,001) at the baseline to 1,010 (778–1,106) ml min−1 (p = 0.005), whilst PI remained stable (from 31 [25–41] to 35 (25–42) %; p = 0.12). In the non-responder group, portal blood flow remained stable after FC (from 1,042 to 1,034 ml min−1; p = 0.084), whereas PI significantly increased from 32 (22–40) to 48% *(25–85) after FC (p = 0.027). PI was negatively correlated to portal blood flow (Rho coefficient = −0.611; p = 0.002). To conclude, PI might be a sensitive marker of early congestion in healthy subjects that did not respond to FC. This finding requires further validation in clinical settings with a larger sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abou‐Arab et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=24). Fluid challenge vs. Baseline was evaluated on Portal vein pulsatility index (PI) in non-responders (p=0.027). In healthy volunteers who did not respond to a fluid challenge, the portal vein pulsatility index significantly increased from 32% to 48% (p=0.027), indicating potential early venous congestion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: